Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Alvarez v. Peralta et al
as 5:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Alvarez , Jr.
Defendant:
John Cirane, FNU Garcia, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Alvarez, Jr. v. Fox Ronald, et al
as 16-50714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANGEL ALVAREZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FOX RONALD, Head Warden, TIMOTHY AULT, Assistant Warden, ANDRES PISARIO, Correctional Officer Sergeant and others
Alvarez v. Ronald et al
as 5:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Alvarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Ault, J. Braley, P. Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Fox et al
as 5:2015cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Alvarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Ault, L. Burr, Ronald Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Alvarez v. Jesus Peralta, et al
as 15-41344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANGEL ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JESUS M. PERALTA, Warden, KELVIN GIVENS, Assistant Warden, PHILEMAN CHANGE, M.D. and others
Barragan v. General Motors LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00854
Defendant:
AMERCO, General Motors Dealership X, General Motors LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Alvarez and Maria Barragan
Movant:
Ruby Campas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
United States v. Alvarez
as 15-6124
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL ALVAREZ
Alvarez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
as 7:2015cv03274
Plaintiff:
Angel Alvarez
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarez et al v. Davies
as 1:2015cv00417
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Alvarez and Juan Rodas
Defendant:
Patrick Davies
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
as UT/2:15-cv-00211
Plaintiff:
Angel Alvarez
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
