Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WildEarth Guardians, et al. v. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services, et al.
as 23-2944
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
WildEarth Guardians et al v. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00508
Plaintiff: Julie Cavanaugh-Bill, Jennifer Schwartz, Talasi Brooks and others
Defendant: United States Attorney District of Nevada, United States Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Prairie Protection Colorado v. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00317
Defendant: U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services, Janet L. Bucknall and USDA APHIS Wildlife Services
Plaintiff: Prairie Protection Colorado
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Canada Geese Protection Colorado LLC et al v. Lowney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01625
Defendant: Martin Lowney, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service - Wildlife Services
Plaintiff: Friends of Animals and Canada Geese Protection Colorado, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Friends of Animals v. Lowney et al
as 1:2019cv02110
Defendant: Martin Lowney, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service - Wildlife Services
Plaintiff: Friends of Animals
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Cascadia Wildlands v. Oregon Office of the State Director for USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services
as 6:2019cv00638
Defendant: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service - Wildlife Services, Oregon Office of the State Director for USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services and United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services et al
as 2:2019cv00020
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services Deputy Administrator, United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services and Janet L Bucknall
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project, WildEarth Guardians and Center for Biological Diversity
Intervenor Defendant: State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. USDA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35508
Plaintiff - Appellant: CASCADIA WILDLANDS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE-WILDLIFE SERVICES, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and DAVID WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Oregon State Director for USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services
WildEarth Guardians et al v. Suckow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00891
Petitioner: WildEarth Guardians and Center for Biological Diversity
Respondent: Jason Suckow , Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service - Wildlife Services and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Colorado Prairie Initiative v. Lowney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00321
Plaintiff: Colorado Prairie Initiative
Defendant: Martin Lowney, Jason Suckow and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service - Wildlife Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?