Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kiger v. Mollenkopf et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Clark T. Randt, Jr., Jeffrey W. Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Nelson and Becky Kiger
Nelson v. Mollenkopf et al
as 3:2020cv01417
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Clark T. Randt, Jr., Jeffrey W. Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Nelson
Kiger v. Mollenkopf et al
as 3:2020cv01355
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Jeffrey W. Henderson, DOES 1-30 and others
Plaintiff:
Becky Kiger and Heather Nelson
Steinberg et al-V-Leo Apotheker et al
as 3:2014cv02287
Plaintiff:
Harriet Steinberg and Edward Vogel
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Ann M. Livermore, Shane V. Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
A. J. Copeland
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weissmann v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Senta Weissmann
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Catherine A. Lesjak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morrical v. Whitman et al
as 3:2012cv06434
Plaintiff:
Stanley Morrical
Defendant:
Margaret C. Whitman, Leo Apotheker, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lustig v. Whitman et al
as 5:2012cv06410
Plaintiff:
Karyn Lustig
Defendant:
Margaret C. Whitman, Marc L Andreessen, Shumeet Banerji and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Tola v. Lynch et al
as 4:2012cv06423
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tola
Defendant:
Michael R Lynch, Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bertisch v. Apotheker et al
as 5:2012cv06123
Plaintiff:
Martin Bertisch
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Catherine A. Lesjak, Marc L Andreessen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
