Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, The General Insurance Company, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employee Benefits
Wade et al v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade and Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank and BB&T Merger, Suntrust "Truist" Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Rossi Wade v. Truist Bank
as 21-1570
Defendant / Appellee:
MAURICE STEWARD, Branch Manager, JODI MEADOWS, Operations Manager, THOMAS N. THOMPSON, Member, Truist Bank Board of Directors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSSI WADE, & DAUGHTER (JANE DOE)
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
BREWSTER SMITH, JR , DORIS KIROUAC , CHRISTINA HAWKS and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION , BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOWERS et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00732
Plaintiff:
BURKE BOWERS , ROBERT SIMS , ERIK GAVIDIA and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION, BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE, BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BORCHARDT v. KING, et al
as 1:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BORCHARDT
Defendant:
KELLY S. KING, CHRISTOPHER L HENSON, DARYL N. BIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
