Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Sunil Bhasin v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
Sunil Bhasin
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, John Valdivia, City of San Bernardino Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orian v. Animal Hope and Wellness Foundation et al
as 2:2021cv01028
Defendant:
Minh Tran, Krystal Tran, Marr A Christian and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Orian
O.L. PRODUCTS, INC. et al v. ARMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv05447
Plaintiff:
O.L. PRODUCTS, INC., SANTO CAROLLO and STEVEN J ESPOSITO
Defendant:
ARMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOSEPH A NIEMI, JOHN L NIEMI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Helmuth Family Trust House Trust B v. Claudia Orian et al
as 5:2018cv01007
Defendant:
All Unknown Occupants, Exotic Meat Markets, Inc., Claudia Orian and others
Plaintiff:
Helmuth Family Trust House Trust B
Pathak v. Pathak
as 2:2018cv00157
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Defendant:
Chetna Pathak
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Pathak v. Fuller et al
as 2:2017cv01571
Defendant:
Chris Fuller, Meatmansteaks.com and The Saint Petersburg Company
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Pathak v. Pathak et al
as 2:2017cv01546
Defendant:
Armand Agra Inc., Jonathan Mosbacher, Anshu Pathak and others
Plaintiff:
Nerry Pathak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Pathak v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00130
Defendant:
Aabaco Holdings, Alibaba, Lexity and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Pathak v. Knigin et al
as 2:2016cv02206
Defendant:
Advansiv, Inc, Advansiv.com, Broadleaf Game Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Pathak v. Yahoo, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02124
Defendant:
AOL Inc., Microsoft, Inc, Specialty Meats and Gourmet LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
