Cases 1 - 8 of 8
USA, et al v. Anthem, Inc., et al
as 17-5028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of California, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthem, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Cigna Corporation
Special Master:
Richard A. Levie
USA, et al v. Anthem, Inc., et al
as 17-5024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of California, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthem, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Cigna Corporation
Special Master:
Richard A. Levie
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016mc02520
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC. and CIGNA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
SELLERS, JR. et al v. ANTHEM, INC.
as 1:2016cv02428
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SELLERS, JR. and RICHARD MCCLEES
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
United States of America v. Anthem, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc02296
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC. and CIGNA CORPORATION
Respondent:
TRUSTMARK SERVICES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016mc02126
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC. and CIGNA CORP.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016mc02052
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC. and CIGNA CORP.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01493
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC, CIGNA CORP. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Petitioner:
KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN, INC., TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., MERCER and others
Special Master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
