Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Smith v. Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00223
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Smith
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Louisville, LLC, Natalie Mosley, Tommy Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Anthony Smith v. Tracy Gorman, et al
as 25-1211
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant:
TRACY GORMAN, President/CEO, JOSHUA NICHOLS, Vice President, RICHARD ROE, Operations Manager and others
Anthony Smith v. John Doe 1, et al
as 25-1068
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, "Brian," Staff on Duty, JOHN DOE 2, "Shane," Management and UNITED CARING SERVICES
SMITH v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and UNITED CARING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. GORMAN et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Defendant:
JOSHUA NICHOLS, JASON HAYES, TIM and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Smith v. Greenberg et al
as 3:2024cv00653
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Paul Humphrey, Russell Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, James R. Cooper, Jeffery B. Belk and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Manning et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
John Manning, Lee, Angela Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
