Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cervantes et al v. BBLI Edison LLC et al
as 1:2024cv06098
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burkhead, Jae Avilez, Lauren Webb and others
Defendant:
Berkshire Communities LLC and BBLI Edison LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cantley et al v. Jacobson Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
April Cantley, H&A Enterprises, Inc., Antonial Childers and others
Defendant:
Jacobson Holdings, Inc. and TAFS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
CERVANTES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11525
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY CERVANTES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cervantes v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00075
Defendant:
Does 1 - 10, CRST International, Inc, CRST Expedited, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cervantes and Mike Cross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cervantes v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10106
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, CRST Expedited, Inc. and CRST International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michael Cervantes v. W. Montgomery
as 18-56029
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CERVANTES
Respondent - Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
Cervantes v. Conn Appliances, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01241
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cervantes
Defendant:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Javen Anthony Cervantes v. Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 8:2015cv00748
Petitioner:
Javen Anthony Cervantes
Respondent:
Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Javen Cervantes v. W. Sullivan
as 08-55991
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAVEN ANTHONY CERVANTES
Respondent - Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden
Cervantes v. Sullivan
as 8:2007cv00486
Petitioner:
Javen Anthony Cervantes
Respondent:
W J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
