Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Williams v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
K. Medcalf, Brian Collier, K. Scholofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Burleson County
as 24-50430
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General, Julie Renken, Burleson County District Attorney, Magistrate Robert W. Urbanosky and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Burleson County
as 23-50641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
Burleson County, Texas, Burleson County Board of County Commissioner's Court, Gene Hermes, Burleson County Sheriff and others
Williams v. Collier
as 23-20319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian Collier, Executive Director of TDCJ Institutional Division, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Chairman David Guiteriez and others
Williams v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Chairman David Guiteriez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Collier et al **Case Transferred to SDTX**
as 6:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Chairman David Guiteriez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Burleson County, Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Burleson County Board of County Commissioner's Court, Gene Hermes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
