Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Hill v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Hill
Defendant:
C. Carter and Rardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swain v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Raymond X Bailey and Ron Swain
Defendant:
Michael W Parris, Anthony Hill, Justin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. U S P Pollock et al
as 1:2022cv05329
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony Hill
Defendant:
Acting Warden U S P Pollock, Unit Manager U S P Pollock and Admin Remedy Coordinator U S P Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tutankhaman v. Hill
as 2:2022cv01502
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant:
Charles Anthony Hill
Hill v. Harvey et al
as 2:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxwell Hill, King Michael Tutankhaman and Grand Royal Prince Michael Dompledore, III
Defendant:
Markus Harvey, Marcos Harvey, Cameron Rye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hill v. Poblete
as 5:2022cv04159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hill
Defendant:
FNU Poblete and Nicholas Poblete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Buesgen
as 2:2022cv00346
Petitioner:
Anthony Hill
Respondent:
Christopher Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. v. HILL
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Defendant:
ANTHONY HILL and CITY PLACE AT 4141, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hill v. Carter et al
as 1:2020cv03752
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, C. Carter, Rardin (I) and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08845
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
