Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pittman v. Pike County, Mississippi
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pittman
Defendant:
Pike County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Pittman
as 22-30733
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Pittman
Pittman v. Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pittman
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections (M.D.O.C.), Unknown Daniels, Management and Training Corp. (M.T.C.) and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. H.'s Power of Attorney v. Yotter et al
as 6:2021cv06250
Defendant:
Richard E. Updegrove, Kendra DiTullio, Traci Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
J.H.'s Power of Attorney and J. H.'s Power of Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85095
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. York
as 3:2019cv00402
Plaintiff:
Clevin Anthony Pittman
Defendant:
O.M. York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. York et al
as 3:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
Clevin Anthony Pittman
Defendant:
D. M. York, M. Sivels and Chesapeake Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deas v. Payreel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06346
Plaintiff:
Devrin Deas , Jobeth Bobee , Sefton Campbell and others
Defendant:
Payreel, Inc. and LDJ Productions NYC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
