Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Anthony Williams
as 20-14644
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY R. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81829
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Williams v. Dr. Shah
as 17-6580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY R. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. SHAH, Mental Health Physician for H.R.R.J., CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, Medical Contractor for H.R.R.J. and HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL, Correctional Facility
Williams v. Shah et al
as 2:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Shah, Correct Care Solutions and Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Wililams v. Hampton Roads Regional Medical Dept. et al
as 2:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Williams
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Medical Dept., Major Hatchett and Dr. Kolongo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hatchett et al
as 2:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Williams
Defendant:
T.D. Hatchett, Mrs. Johnson and H.R.R.J. Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharon Y Sosa et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
as 5:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
Ankur Baishya, Irina Barbarov, Natalie Daliah Barrantes and others
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Williams v. Workman
as 2:2007cv00176
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Williams
Defendant:
Thomas A. Workman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
