Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Washington v. NYC Medical Practice, P.C. et al
as 1:2018cv09052
Plaintiff:
Tyesha Washington
Defendant:
M.D. Anthony Ray Perkins, M.D. Sergey Voskin and NYC Medical Practice, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tn
Wendt v. United States Department of Agriculture/Wayne County Farm Service Agency et al
as 6:2014cv06682
Plaintiff:
Donald P. Wendt
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture/Wayne County Farm Service Agency, William S. Jones, Virginia Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wendt v. United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency et al
as 5:2012cv00342
Plaintiff:
Donald P. Wendt
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture/Natural Resource Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture/Commodity Credit Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Moore et al v. Mota et al
as 3:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Moore and Cheryl Moore
Defendant:
Ronald Mota, Deolindo Mota, Al-Ko Kober Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
