Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Oliphant v. Villano
as 17-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee: Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Oliphant v. Villano
as 14-1077
Plaintiff - Appellee: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant: Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant - Appellant: Robert Villano
Oliphant v. Villano
as 14-1069
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Defendant - Appellee: Mark Sheppard, William Onofrio, Darlene Passapera, AKA Jane Doe #1 and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Robert Villano
Oliphant v. McGill
as 12-1210
Petitioner - Appellant: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent - Appellee: Jeffrey McGill, Warden and Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut Attorney General
Oliphant v. Quiros et al
as 12-884
Petitioner - Appellant: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent - Appellee: Angel Quiros and Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut Attorney General
Oliphant v. McGill
as 11-4654
Petitioner - Appellant: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent - Appellee: Jeffrey McGill, Warden and Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut Attorney General
Oliphant v. Quiro
as 11-3279
Petitioner - Appellant: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent - Appellee: Angel Quiros and Richard Blumenthal, CT Atty Gen
Oliphant v. Quiro
as 10-3355
Petitioner - Appellant: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent - Appellee: Angel Quiros, Warden and Richard Blumenthal, CT Atty Gen
Oliphant v. Quiros et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01771
Petitioner: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent: Angel Quiros and Richard Blumenthal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliphant v. McGill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00557
Petitioner: Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent: Jeffrey McGill and Richard Blumenthal
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?