Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-945
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Woods v. Cadle et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Lindsey Cadle, Apryl Bradshaw, Tonia McFarland Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. S.C. Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
S.C. Department of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement and Cintas Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv05108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Woods v. SC Department of Social Services
as 6:2023cv04812
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
SC Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08149
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13075
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Woods v. Wagoner, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Wagoner, City of, Wagoner Police Department, Tony Ponds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. WOODS et al
as 7:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
REMUS BELL
Defendant:
ANTHONY WOODS, BUDDY MOORE TRUCKING, INC. and NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
