Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
National Labor Relations Board v. Green
as 3:2025cv01515
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Malcolm Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 3:2025mc80036
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board and Malcolm Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
United States Government National Labor Relations Board v. Green
as 3:2025mc80037
Petitioner: United States Government National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Malcolm Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Green v. Shelby County Division of Correction et al
as 2:2024cv03001
Defendant: Sarah Washington, Reece Walker, Tgichona Baldwin and others
Plaintiff: Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Shelby County Division of Correction et al
as 2:2024cv03002
Plaintiff: Antonio Green
Defendant: Shelby County Division of Correction, Tgichona Baldwin, Steven Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Rico Green
as 24-6150
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RICO ANTONIO GREEN
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07062
Plaintiff: ANTONIO GREEN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Gunthar et al
as 1:2022cv01437
Defendant: . Fisher, . Gunthar, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff: Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Warden Gunthar et al
as 6:2022cv02221
Defendant: Jane Doe, Warden Gunthar, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff: Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04914
Plaintiff: Antonio Green
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?