Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Freeman v. Lewis et al
as 1:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Michael Byron Lewis, Maxey Cerliano, Tanya Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Administration and Ivy Anderson-York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Lewis et al
as 6:2016cv01009
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Michael Byron Lewis and Zack Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arenas et al v. Sandford Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ashland Arenas , Jason Villareal , Cedric Camp and others
Defendant:
Sandford Oil Company, Inc., Sandford Oil South Texas, Inc., Western Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, State Classification In Huntsville (SCC) and Unit Classification Robertson Unit (UCC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Antonio Freeman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, State Classification In Huntsville (SCC) and Unit Classification Robertson Unit (UCC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Freeman v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-41210
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Freeman v. Clark
as 3:2015cv00483
Petitioner:
Antonio Freeman
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00278
Petitioner:
Antonio Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00121
Petitioner:
Antonio Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
