Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garibay v. PNW Veg Co LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01857
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Mendez Garibay
Defendant:
PNW Veg Co LLC a Washington limited liability company doing business as NORPAC of the PNW, Oregon Potato Company and Lineage Master Re LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mendez-Navarrete v. Garland
as 22-1404
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MENDEZ-NAVARRETE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Arturo Mendez-Gomez
as 22-254
Petitioner:
In re: ARTURO MENDEZ-GOMEZ, a/k/a Antonio Mendez-Gomez
Mendez et al v. Danny Herman Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Antonio Mendez, Rosa Guerra, Jordan Duenas and others
Defendant:
Danny Herman Trucking, Inc. and Bradley Dean Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
United States of America v. Mendez Feliz
as 22-1116
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marcos Antonio Mendez Feliz, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
USA v. Mendez
as 22-10293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Antonio Mendez, also known as Ace
Asencion Ginez Dominguez et al v. Leonidas Osorio
as 2:2021cv09022
Defendant:
Leonidas Osorio, Rony Osorio, Antonio Mendez an individual doing business as La Unica Internacional Sonora Santanera S. de RL doing business as La Internacional Sonora Santanera SA de CV and others
Plaintiff:
Asencion Ginez Dominguez and Yolanda Almazan Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MENDEZ-RAMOS v. USA
as 5:2021cv00244
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MENDEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Antonio Mendez-Ramos
as 20-12821
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO MENDEZ-RAMOS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
