Cases 81 - 90 of 139
McRight v. Apple Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03330
Plaintiff:
Joanne McRight
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Applecare Service Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22663
Plaintiff:
Douglas T. Edwards and Mobile World View Technologies, Innovations, Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc. , Harshaw Research, Inc., Dale J Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
English v. Apple Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03284
Plaintiff:
Fabrienne English
Defendant:
Apple Inc and Applecare Service Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
A123 Systems, Inc. v. Apple Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv10438
Plaintiff:
A123 Systems Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc. , Mujeeb Ijaz , Michael Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jerry Jacobsen v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01099
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jacobsen
Ericsson Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericcson
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odish et al v. Apple, Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv14886
Defendant:
Nuance Inc., APPLE INC., Northrop Grumman Corporation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Odish and Cranbrook Capital Consulting Group, LLC
Marcus et al v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2014cv03824
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Plaintiff:
Uriel Marcus and Benedict Verceles
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Charlene Gallion, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 14-16084
:
In re: APPLE IPHONE/IPOD WARRANTY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLENE GALLION, DANIEL CALIX and CHRISTOPHER CORSI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
MICHAEL CASEY
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC., a California corporation
Moore v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2014cv02269
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Moore
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
