Cases 91 - 100 of 153
Yastrab v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2014cv01974
Plaintiff:
David Yastrab
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adkins et al v. Apple Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01619
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sue Adkins , Jennifer Galindo and Fabrienne English
Defendant:
Apple Inc , Applecare Service Company Inc and Apple CSC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Fazio, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 14-15487
:
In re: IPHONE 4S CONSUMER LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK M. FAZIO, CARLISA S. HAMAGAKI, DANIEL M. BALASONNE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC., a California Corporation
Roman v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2013cv05437
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rendell Roman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alex Tomek v. Apple, Inc.
as 13-16696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX TOMEK
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Weiselberg v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2013cv02920
Plaintiff:
Scott J. Weiselberg
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Opperman et al v. Path, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Marc Opperman , Judy Long , Claire Moses and others
Defendant:
Path, Inc. , Twitter, Inc. , Apple Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howell v. Carrier IQ, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02314
Plaintiff:
George Howell
Defendant:
Carrier IQ, Inc , Apple Inc and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Naotaka Kitagawa, Jr., et al v. Kerry Sweeney
as 12-16053
:
In re: MAGSAFE APPLE POWER ADAPTER LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAOTAKA KITAGAWA, Jr., TIMOTHY J. BROAD, JESSE REISMAN and others
Objector - Appellant:
KERRY ANN SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Naotaka Kitagawa, Jr., et al v. Jeremy Lee
as 12-15816
:
In re: MAGSAFE APPLE POWER ADAPTER LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAOTAKA KITAGAWA, Jr., TIMOTHY J. BROAD, JESSE REISMAN and others
Appellant:
JEREMY LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
