Cases 11 - 20 of 203
Schermer v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2024cv01815
Plaintiff:
Jared Schermer
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Collins et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins and Henry Morales
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Felix Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
In re Ex Parte Application of: Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2024mc80019
Plaintiff:
In re Ex Parte Application of: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Respondent:
Apple Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Bakay et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Luisa Bakay, Elisa Jones and Leticia Shaw
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
In Re Subpoenas to Apple, Inc.
as 5:2023mc80325
Respondent:
Apple, Inc.
Petitioner:
Element Capital Commercial Co. PTE. Ltd
Wescott v. Apple Inc
as 5:2023cv06254
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Wescott
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierre et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2023cv05981
Plaintiff:
Lamartine Pierre, Mark Whitlock, Lynn-Marie Rodrigues and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Ex Parte Application of APPLE INC.; APPLE DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL; AND APPLE RETAIL GERMANY B.V. & CO. KG
as 4:2023mc80293
In Re:
Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International and Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG
Respondent:
RPX Corporation
In re National Football League's "Sunday Ticket" Litigation
as 5:2023mc80275
Plaintiff:
In re National Football League's "Sunday Ticket" Litigation, 1465 Third Avenue Restaurant Corp. dba Gael Pub, Robert Gary Lippincott, Jr., and Jonathan Frantz. and Ninth Inning Inc. dba The Mucky Duck
Petitioner:
Apple Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
