Cases 51 - 60 of 325
Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05110
Defendant:
Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Elm 3DS Innovations LLC
as 3:2021mc80169
Plaintiff:
Elm 3DS Innovations LLC
Petitioner:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Jim Marshall Photography LLC v. Los Angeles Times Communications LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01138
Defendant:
Los Angeles Times Communications LLC and Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jim Marshall Photography LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Elton Newman et al v. Distrokid LLC et al
as 2:2020cv10745
Defendant:
Pandora Media, LLC, Distrokid LLC, Apple Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elton Newman, Tyrone Cosey and D Artanian Stovall
Petitioner:
D'Artanian Stovall
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2021cv00995
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Uniloc 2017 LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Wargaming.Net Limited v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01066
Defendant:
APPLE, INC., a California corporation and Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
WARGAMING.NET LIMITED, a Cyprus limited company and Wargaming.Net Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
as 5:2020cv02460
Defendant:
Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Melvin Warren Rivers v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv09619
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers and Juice Lee
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Hulu, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Parus Holdings Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc et al.
as 3:2020cv05896
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc. and LG Electronics Inc
Consolidated Defendant:
Google LLC, Amazon.com Inc, Samsung Electronics America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Parus Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apple Inc. v. Koss Corporation
as 4:2020cv05504
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
Koss Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
