Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Barrett v. Splawn et al
as 1:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lee Barrett
Defendant:
Chief Bill Splawn, Lt C Freeburg, Ernest Coxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowell Jackson v. Eddie Climmer, et al
as 18-35235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL EDWARD JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE CLIMMER, BILL BRADY and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, Inc.
Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Inc., Bill Brady and Eddie Climmer
Plaintiff:
Lowell Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maier v. Snohomish County Corrections Bureau et al
as 2:2017cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael John Maier
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections Bureau , Aston , Belinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Umatilla County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv01379
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Stewart Harp, Thoren Hearn and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Howard Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. County of Las Vegas, Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv01658
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Attorney for the public, Budgeting Financial Department and others
Plaintiff:
Nicki Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madueno v. Aramark Food Service Provider
as 2:2011cv00589
Plaintiff:
Orlando Madueno
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Provider and Solano County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al
as 2:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
Claude Young, III
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Provider and Solano County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al
as 2:2011cv00370
Plaintiff:
Carl Eric Collier
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Provider and Solano County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider, et al
as 2:2010cv02865
Plaintiff:
Dennis Merrida
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Provider and Solano County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
