Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 545
Cooperwood v. Tripp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00330
Plaintiff: Brandon Cooperwood
Defendant: Arden Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06181
Plaintiff: Daniel Arden Davis
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sauray v. Arden Claims Service LLC
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff: Evan Sauray
Defendant: Arden Claims Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Victoria Dillihunt et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff: Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant: United States of America, Matthew Abram Groening, Society of Jesus Jesuit Order and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Arden, LLC v. Ryan L. Stewart Boglin et al
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff: The Arden, LLC
Defendant: Ryan L. Stewart Boglin, Penelope Hill, Neville Zepeda and others
Jones v. McCormack
as 24-54
Petitioner / Appellant: RAFAEL ARDEN JONES
Respondent / Appellee: NED MCCORMACK
AML IP, LLC v. Ardene USA, Inc.
as 1:2023cv11270
Plaintiff: AML IP, LLC
Defendant: Ardene USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Chocktoot et al v. Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02992
Plaintiff: Desiree Chocktoot, Darneece Veazey, Leslie Johnson and others
Defendant: Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC, Riley Corbin and Natalie Law
Jones v. McCormack We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10522
Petitioner: Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent: Ned McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?