Cases 21 - 30 of 247
Tesoro v. Wright, et al
as 11-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ULISES TESORO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH WRIGHT, KATRINA BOYD, MICHAEL BERGANDO and others
Allen v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, FRACKMORE, Sergeant, S VIGIL, Officer and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BOATWRIGHT, Sergeant
Kailey v. Ritter, et al
as 11-1372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL RITTER, ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, KEITH NORDELL and others
Freeman v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2011cv01955
Petitioner:
Robert J. Freeman
Respondent:
Aristedes Zavaras and The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Broadus v. Timme, et al
as 11-1337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL BROADUS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAE TIMME, Warden, JACKIE MCCALL, Lieutenant, DIRECTO, Lieutenant and others
Nasious v. State Of Colorado, et al
as 11-1310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NASIOUS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, Office of the Governor Bill Ritter, MARTHA MUELLER, Physician Health Partners, BARRY GOLDSMITH, Physician Health Partners and others
Rueb v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, SUSAN JONES, DENNIS BURBANK and others
Rueb v. Brown, et al
as 11-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JOSEPH RUEB
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWN, DENNIS BURBANK, DANIEL DENT, DOE (3 "John Doe" mailroom officers and others
Pettigrew v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN ALEXANDER PETTIGREW
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, SUSAN JONES, LARRY REED and others
Rounds v. Clements, et al
as 11-1220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN ROUNDS
Defendant - Appellant:
TOM CLEMENTS, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections
Defendant:
DENNIS CORBIN and ARISTEDES ZAVARAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
