Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Campos v. Helmhold et al

as 2:2022cv01806
Plaintiff:
Nathan Campos
Defendant:
Daniel Helmhold, Aristocrat Leisure Limited, Big Fish Games Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Nathan Campos v. Daniel Helmhold et al
as 2:2022cv03959
Plaintiff:
Nathan Campos
Defendant:
Daniel Helmhold, Aristocrat Leisure Limited, Big Fish Games, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Manasa Thimmegowda v. Big Fish Games, Inc., et al
as 20-35043
Defendant / Appellant:
CHURCHILL DOWNS, INC., a Kentucky corporation, ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation, ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED, an Australian corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MANASA THIMMEGOWDA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Manasa Thimmegowda v. Big Fish Games, Inc., et al
as 19-36090
Defendant / Appellee:
CHURCHILL DOWNS, INC., a Kentucky corporation, ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation, ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED, an Australian corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANASA THIMMEGOWDA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Thimmegowda v. Big Fish Games Inc et al

as 2:2019cv00199
Defendant:
Churchill Downs Incorporated, Aristocrat Leisure Limited, Aristocrat Technologies Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Manasa Thimmegowda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bally Gaming, Inc. v. Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. et al

as 2:2016cv02359
Defendant:
Aristocrat Leisure Limited, Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. and Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bally Gaming, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
IGT v. Aristocrat Technologies Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01748
Counter Claimant:
Aristocrat Leisure Limited and Aristocrat Technologies Inc
Cross Defendant:
Aristocrat Leisure Limited and Aristocrat Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Aristocrat Leisure Limited and Aristocrat Technologies Inc
Counter Defendant:
IGT
Cross Claimant:
IGT
Plaintiff:
IGT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.