Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Arizmendi v. Performance Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02723
Plaintiff:
Madeline Arizmendi
Defendant:
Performance Food Group, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Arizmendi v. Rich Products Corp.
as 22-1971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Julianna Arizmendi
Defendant / Appellee:
Rich Products Corp.
Pajarito et al v. Latin Brands Restaurant Groups Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv08343
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Pajarito, Carlos Perez and Jonathan Sanchez
Defendant:
Latin Brands Restaurant Groups Inc. doing business as Salsa Bembe, Lucas Lucido, Devis Berati and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arizmendi v. Rich Products Corp.
as 3:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Julianne Arizmendi
Defendant:
Rich Products Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Juarez et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 1:2019cv05868
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), New York Asylum Office (USCIS), Andrew Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
Fanny Romero Caballero, Alejandra Moran Juarezs, Alexa Arizmendi Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pineda et al v. Frisoling, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03774
Plaintiff:
Luis Pineda , Eddy F. Jaquez , Robinson Ortega Diaz and others
Defendant:
Frisoling, Inc., Mario Migliorini, Maria Migliorini Citron and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arizmendi v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02565
Plaintiff:
Yuriko Arizmendi
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Phillippe Dupont, John Doe Police Officers #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arizmendi v. The City Of New York. et al
as 1:2007cv00795
Plaintiff:
Henry J. Arizmendi
Defendant:
The City Of New York., The New York City Police Department, John and Jane Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
