Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 808
Bio Gen LLC et al v. Arkansas, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00718
Plaintiff: Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant: Arkansas, State of, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, John Timothy Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Mills v. Faulkner County Sheriff's Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00703
Plaintiff: Luke Mills
Defendant: Faulkner County Sheriff's Department, Faulkner County Police Department, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Dylan Brandt, et al v. Tim Griffin, et al
as 23-2681
Plaintiff / Appellee: Dylan Brandt, by and through his mother Joanna Brandt, Joanna Brandt, Sabrina Jennen, by and through her parents Lacey and Aaron Jennen and others
Defendant / Appellant: Tim Griffin, in his official capacity as the Arkansas Attorney General, Amy E. Embry, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Michael J. Birrer, in official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Russell v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00648
Plaintiff: Derrick L Russell
Defendant: Eric S Higgins, Doe, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brainerd v. Ward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04066
Plaintiff: Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant: Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brainerd v. Ward, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff: Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant: Chad Ward, Lt. Ontravarious, Chief Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hubbard El v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00639
Plaintiff: Antonio Hubbard El
Defendant: USA and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alamin El v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00638
Plaintiff: Abdul Alamin El and Cortez Thomas
Defendant: USA and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?