Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Ullom v. Armstrong
as 2:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
Terry Glen Ullom
Respondent:
Glen Armstrong and Warden Glen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lietz, et al. v. Drug Enforcement Administration, et al.
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Paul Lietz, Sakahann Ouch, Vutha Ren and others
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, SA Colin Fine, SA David Clyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
Zachary Tyler Allen
Respondent:
State of Idaho, Brad Little, Idaho Attorney Genrell and others
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Sgt Taylor Wilson, Lt. Hust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenup et al v. Morris et al
as 4:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Richard Armstrong, John 1-20 Does, Elizabeth Loosli and others
Plaintiff:
Jane 1-20 Does, Danielle Greenup, Darce Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tibbitts v. Armstrong
as 4:2019cv00155
Respondent:
Glen Armstrong
Petitioner:
Robert Wesley Tibbitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare et al
as 1:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
Shellie R Miller and Shelly R Miller
Defendant:
Todd Hurt, Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, State Hospital North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piro v. Carlin et al
as 1:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Piro
Defendant:
Justin Armstrong, D W McKay, Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longee v. Armstrong
as 1:2018cv00272
Petitioner:
Nicholas J Longee
Respondent:
Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meyers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Richard Paul Meyers
Defendant:
Ramirez, Wessels, Overguard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
