Cases 1 - 10 of 930
Peterson et al v. Bloom et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Jeffrey Arnett, Sean Sikora, Tom Bloom and others
Plaintiff:
Becky Rodd and Chris Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARIAN HEALTH WEST, LLC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv03153
Plaintiff:
CLARIAN HEALTH WEST, LLC and INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH ARNETT, INC.
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carolyn Arnett v. Larry Norris, et al
as 24-3144
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, In his individual capacity (originally named as Roy Hobbs), John Wheeler, In his individual capacity, Linda Dykes, In her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arnett
United States v. Arnett
as 24-6212
Defendant:
GLEN DELANE ARNETT, JR.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arnett v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08678
Plaintiff:
Andrea Arnett
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnette v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv02487
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Keisa Arnette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Pan American Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv02274
Defendant:
Shannell N. Allen, Jerome M. Alexander, Chaquitah Olitha and others
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Arnett Thomas v. Samuel Plumeri, Jr., et al
as 24-2680
Plaintiff:
ARNETT LEE THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN CRAIG, Captain, ROXANA MERLANO, Parole Officer, MICHAEL ALMONTE, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
