Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Golf Course Properties, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00172
Cross Claimant:
Stanleys Rent to Own and Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Columbia Mutual Insurance Company, Stanleys Get It Today, Golf Course Properties, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Richard Arthur Gray, Justis Xavier Spears and Brenda Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
BancFirst Insurance Services, Inc. and Corbin Lynn Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09153
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ARTHUR GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv06597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv06317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Arthur Gray v. Stu Sherman
as 2:2018cv07721
Petitioner:
Arthur Gray
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05378
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04706
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gray v. Bakersfield Parks, LP, et al
as 1:2016cv01860
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gray
Defendant:
Bakersfield Parks, LP and Heritage Funding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
