Cases 1 - 10 of 175
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Howard, et al. v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 24-1384
Petitioner:
TRACY HOWARD, ADINA RINGLER and TRECEE ARTIS
Respondent:
THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Artis Gipson v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTIS GIPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of Department of Corrections at Central Office, HIGGINSON, Deputy Warden at Tucson/Cimarron Unknown and JORGE TORRES, D.H.O. at Tucson Cimarron
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnny Artis v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2022cv01963
Plaintiff:
Johnny Artis
Defendant:
Riverside County and Chad Bianco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
