Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nicole Aaron et al v. Epson America, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01712
Petitioner:
Rick Allen, Dawn Adams, Nicole Aaron and others
Respondent:
Epson America, Inc.
Defendant:
Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Anaya v. LNU
as 2:2022cv00652
Petitioner:
Arturo Anaya
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douangdara v. M&K Transport, Corp. et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Soubanh Douangdara
Defendant:
M&K Transport Corp, Knight Refrigerated, LLC and Arturo Anaya Ayala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Douangdara v. M&K Transport, Corp. et al
as 4:2021cv01263
Plaintiff:
Soubanh Douangdara
Defendant:
Knight Refrigerated, LLC, M&K Transport, Corp., Arturo Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Blanco et al v. Knight Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia Medina, Aleyda Hernandez Avila and Alexander Garcia Blanco
Defendant:
Knight Transportation, Inc., Knight Refrigerated, LLC, Soubanh Douangdara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anaya v. FNU LNU, et al
as 20-2162
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTURO ANAYA
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and FNU LNU, Warden
Anaya v. Hatch
as 1:2020cv00357
Petitioner:
Arturo Anaya
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anaya v. LNU
as 1:2020cv00328
Petitioner:
Arturo Anaya
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anaya v. Hatch et al
as 1:2016cv00331
Petitioner:
Arturo Anaya
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Acosta et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2012cv00404
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Acosta , Maria Acosta , Arturo Anaya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
