Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. One Smith & Wesson .44 caliber 29 Revolver et al
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Smith & Wesson .44 caliber 29 revolver, One Beretta .22 caliber U22 Neos pistol, One AMT Automag II .22 caliber pistol and others
Claimant:
Stuart Powell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. Numerous Rounds of Assorted Ammunition
as 2:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Numerous Rounds of Assorted Ammunition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Norinco model SKS 7.62x39mm caliber semi-automatic rifle, SN 9018630 et al
as 2:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Norinco Model SKS 7.62x39mm Caliber Semi-Automatic Rifle, SN 9018630, Iberia Firearms Model 40 S & W .40 Caliber Semi-Automatic Pistol, SN 120983 and Assorted Ammunition
United States of America v. Rossi, Model M4122B, .22LR caliber rifle, serial number SP498812 et al
as 2:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rossi, Model M4122B, .22LR caliber rifle, serial number SP498812, Mossberg, Model 500A, Gamester, 12-gauge shotgun, serial number J749795, Remington, Model 581, .22 S-L-LR caliber rifle, serial number A1055836 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
United States of America v. Norinco, Model SKS 7.62 Caliber Semi-Automatic Rifle, Four Additional Firearms and Assorted Ammunition
as 2:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Norinco Model SKS 7.62 Caliber Semi-Automatic Rifle, Four Additional Firearms and Assorted Ammunition
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
United States of America v. EDM Arms, Windrunner XM04 Rifle, Twelve Other Firearms and Assorted Ammunition
as 2:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
EDM Arms, Windrunner XM04 Rifle, Twelve Other Firearms and Assorted Ammunition
Cause Of Action: Civil forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
