Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Curtis Rabenberg v. SD Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al
as 25-1693
Petitioner:
Curtis Ronald Rabenberg
Respondent:
South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles, Teresa Bettinger, Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Lance Owen, et al v. Attorney General/State of SD
as 25-1194
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen and Warden Reyes
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Michael Whirlwind Horse, Jr. v. Alex Reyes, et al
as 24-3588
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whirlwind Horse, Jr.
Respondent:
Marty Jackley, The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and Warden Alex Reyes
Lance Owen v. Warden Reyes, et al
as 24-3557
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Warden Reyes
Stephanie Schurman v. Steven Luke, et al
as 24-3342
Respondent:
Steven Luke, Jail Administrator and Marty Jackley, Attorney General of the state of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Bradley Quist v. Kellie Wasko, et al
as 24-3327
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Quist
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and Kellie Wasko, Secretary of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3259
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Longsoldier v. South Dakota State Penitentiary Warden et al
as 4:2024cv04183
Respondent:
South Dakota State Penitentiary Warden and The Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Damen Longsoldier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald East v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-2997
Defendant:
Brent Fluke, Warden Mike Durfee State Prison, Alex Reyes, Acting Warden Mike Durfee State Prison and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Plaintiff:
Donald East
Lemuel Bell v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 24-2988
Petitioner:
Lemuel R. Bell
Respondent:
State of South Dakota and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
