Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Coker v. Gordy et al
as 4:2018cv00767
Petitioner:
Larry Gwen Coker
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cathey v. Bolling et al
as 2:2017cv01062
Petitioner:
Daveon L Cathey
Respondent:
Leon Bolling and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. State of Alabama et al
as 7:2014cv01984
Petitioner:
Paul Thomas
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Headley, Board of Pardons and Paroles (State of Alabama) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Billips et al
as 6:2014cv01907
Petitioner:
Troy H. Smith
Respondent:
Phyllis Billips and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zaner v. Gordon et al
as 1:2014cv01398
Petitioner:
Johnathan W. Zaner
Respondent:
Gordon and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01386
Petitioner:
Larry Joe Jordan
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tidwell v. Butler et al
as 3:2013cv00612
Petitioner:
Noah Monroe Tidwell
Respondent:
Freddy Butler and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Mitchel et al
as 5:2007cv02146
Petitioner:
Demetrick Deangelo Young
Respondent:
Gene Mitchel and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowe v. Jones et al
as 2:2007cv01505
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Lowe
Defendant:
Kennth Jones and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipscomb v. Culliver et al
as 2:2007cv01482
Plaintiff:
Antoine M Lipscomb
Defendant:
Grant Culliver and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
