Cases 11 - 20 of 111
EARLS v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI-HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2018cv01552
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WAYNE EARLS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI-HUNTINGDON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPENCE-BEY v. GOVERNOR OF PA et al
as 2:2017cv04292
Petitioner:
JASON GARY SPENCE-BEY
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF COMM, OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sims v. Mahally et al
as 3:2017cv01647
Petitioner:
Charles Sims
Respondent:
Lawrence Mahally , John E. Wetzel , John J Talaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Priset v. Attorney General of PA
as 1:2017cv00336
Petitioner:
Matthew D. Priset
Respondent:
Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARCIA v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv05920
Petitioner:
ORLANDO GARCIA
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, DISTR. ATT. OF PHILADELPHIA CNTY. and STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GALLOWAY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv05809
Petitioner:
KEITH GALLOWAY
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, DISTR. ATT. OF PHILADELPHIA CNTY. and STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2015cv02434
Petitioner:
Domenique T. Wilson
Respondent:
Tammy Ferguson and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Owens v. Overmeyer, et al
as 1:2015cv02243
Petitioner:
Kent Owens
Respondent:
Michael Overmeyer, Attorney General of PA and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BATES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2015cv05527
Petitioner:
GEORGE BATES
Respondent:
FERGUSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CHESTER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON v. KANE et al
as 2:2015cv05375
Petitioner:
TODD A. WILSON
Respondent:
KATHLEEN KANE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA and WARDEN SCI CAMP HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
