Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Carey v. Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
as 2:2013cv02258
Petitioner:
Carlos Dewayne Carey
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Helton v. Bibb County Circuit Court et al
as 7:2013cv02085
Petitioner:
James Kyle Helton
Respondent:
Bibb County Circuit Court and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tidwell v. Butler et al
as 3:2013cv00612
Petitioner:
Noah Monroe Tidwell
Respondent:
Freddy Butler and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Davenport et al
as 5:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Phelps
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Boyd
as 4:2013cv00171
Petitioner:
Hiram Preston Anderson, II
Respondent:
Louis Boyd and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Thomas et al
as 3:2012cv03007
Petitioner:
Thomas James Roberts
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barlow v. Mitchem et al
as 1:2012cv00253
Petitioner:
Shannon Dean Barlow
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of State of Alabama.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2011cv02800
Petitioner:
Jay F Vann
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byrd v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv02551
Petitioner:
Joseph B Byrd
Respondent:
John Rathman and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shapley v. Thomas et al
as 3:2011cv02434
Petitioner:
Shaun Glovis Shapley
Respondent:
Kim Thomas, Kenneth Jones and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
