Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Bryant v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv02301
Petitioner: Nicholas Bryant
Respondent: Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Davenport et al
as 1:2011cv01319
Petitioner: Terry Kelly
Respondent: Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Mitchem et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01129
Petitioner: James Earl Morris
Respondent: Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winston v. Thomas et al
as 1:2011cv01043
Petitioner: Timothy Winston
Respondent: Willie Thomas and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
New v. Mullins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00998
Petitioner: Mark A New
Respondent: James Mullins and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rutland v. United States Attorney General for State of Alabama
as 3:2011cv00191
Plaintiff: Clarence Rutland
Defendant: United States Attorney General for State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thomas et al
as 2:2011cv00505
Petitioner: Antonio Shawn Williams
Respondent: Willie Thomas and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowser v. Daniel et al
as 2:2011cv00328
Petitioner: Bennie Rowser
Respondent: Lee Posey Daniel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scales v. Davenport et al
as 4:2011cv00231
Petitioner: Louis Joesph Scales
Respondent: Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rutland v. United States Attorney General for State of Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011mc00003
Plaintiff: Clarence Rutland
Defendant: United States Attorney General for State of Alabama

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?