Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Roger Raymond v. Amber Pirraglia, et al
as 25-1773
Petitioner:
Roger Allen Raymond
Respondent:
Amber Pirraglia, Interim Warden State Penitentiary Sioux Falls and Marty Jackley, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Lance Owen v. Warden Reyes, et al
as 24-3557
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Warden Reyes
Luis Torres Olage, Jr. v. Alejandro Reyes, et al
as 24-2840
Respondent:
Alejandro Reyes, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Marty Jackley, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Luis Torres Olage, Jr.
Earl Dowty v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-2388
Respondent:
Marty J. Jackley, The Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Brent Fluke, Warden
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Darrian Johnson v. Sheriff Mike Milstead, et al
as 24-2174
Petitioner:
Darrian Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Mike Milstead and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Earl Dowty v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Earl Dowty v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-1606
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Garland Gregory, Jr. v. Herman Solem, et al
as 22-3172
Petitioner:
Garland Ray Gregory, Jr.
Respondent:
Herman Solem, Warden, State Penitentiary, Mark V Meierhenry, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Mark Vargo, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Alexander Palomarez v. Daniel Sullivan, et al
as 22-2426
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Alexander Palomarez v. Daniel Sullivan, et al
as 22-2008
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan, Warden and Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
