Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Johnpier v. Prince et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Gordon Johnpier
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing and Dr. Kenneth Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Hopper
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing, Charles Ricket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnpier et al v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Petitioner:
Gordon Blake Johnpier and Dustin Lee Hopper
Respondent:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing, Charles Ricket and others
Defendant:
Dr. Kenneth Matthews and All Healthcare Providers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen v. Swing
as 2:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
Johnathan Allen
Respondent:
Austin Swing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Bedford Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Clinton Reed
Defendant:
Bedford Co. Sheriff Dept., Austin Swing, Ronnie Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mason v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
George Mason
Defendant:
Stephen Daugherty, Shane George, (f/n/u) Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. West et al
as 4:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Austin Swing, Mary West and Jason Williams
Plaintiff:
James O. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. West et al
as 4:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Austin Swing, Mary West and Jason Williams
Plaintiff:
Sean C Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd et al v. West et al
as 4:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Mary West, Jason Williams and Austin Swing
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S Smith, Joshua Bailey, Joshua C Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savely v. Swing et al
as 4:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Marybeth (no last name given), Tim Lokey, Kenneth Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Antywan Savely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
