Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SUY et al v. PONCE et al
as 2:2017cv03029
Plaintiff:
CINDY SUY and TONG PHAL
Defendant:
JOSEPH PONCE , POY HOLDINGS, INC. , POY AUTO PARTS SUPPLY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Alika Atay, et al v. County of Maui, et al
as 15-16466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALIKA ATAY, LORRIN PANG, MARK SHEEHAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MAUI, MONSANTO COMPANY, ROBERT ITO FARM, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION and CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, MOMS ON A MISSION (MOM) HUI, MOLOKA'I MAHI'AI, and GERRY ROSS
Robert Ito Farm, Inc., et al v. County of Maui, et al
as 15-15246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT ITO FARM, INC., HAWAII FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, MAUI COUNTY, "Maui Farm Bureau", MOLOKAI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Intervenor-Defendant:
ALIKA ATAY, LORRIN PANG, MARK SHEEHAN and others
Movant - Appellant:
THE MOMS ON A MISSION (MOM) HUI, MOLOKAI MAHIAI, GERRY ROSS and others
Alika Atay et al. v. County of Maui et al.
as 1:2014cv00582
Plaintiff:
Alika Atay , Lorrin Pang , Mark Sheehan and others
Defendant:
County of Maui , Dow Agrosciences LLC , Monsanto Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of Maui
as 1:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Robert Ito Farm, Inc. , Hawaii Farm Bureau Federation, Maui County , Molokai Chamber of Commerce and others
Defendant:
County of Maui
Intervenor_defendant:
Alika Atay , Lorrin Pang , Mark Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
New York City Economic Development Corporation v. Empire Auto Parts Supply, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01778
Plaintiff:
New York City Economic Development Corporation
Defendant:
Empire Auto Parts Supply, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Empire Auto Parts Supply, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
New York City Economic Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
