Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Mark Sanchez v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01261
Plaintiff:
Mark Sanchez
Defendant:
Autozone Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mark Sanchez v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01347
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Mark Sanchez
Unknown:
Michael Damon Coats and Neda Roshanian
Lynnetta Ellison v. Autozone Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01149
Plaintiff:
Lynnetta Ellison
Defendant:
Autozone Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Lugo v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00787
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and Autozoners, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marco Lugo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lynnetta Ellison v. Autozone Inc
as 12-56569
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LYNNETTA ELLISON, on behalf of herself and a class of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
AUTOZONE INC, a Nevada Corporation
Michael Taylor, et al v. AutoZone Incorporated, et al
as 12-15378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. TAYLOR, DILAWAR KHAN, VOLENA GLOVER-HALE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTOZONE INCORPORATED, a Tennessee corporation authorized to do business in Arizona, AUTOZONERS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation authorized to do business in Arisona
Santos v. AutoZone Inc
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jorge Santos
Defendant:
AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Barrand v. Autozone Inc Associates Disability Income Plan et al
as 1:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Kristy L Barrand
Defendant:
Autozone Inc Associates Disability Income Plan and AutoZone Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Lynnetta Ellison v. Autozone Inc et al
as 3:2011cv05275
Plaintiff:
Lynnetta Ellison
Defendant:
Autozone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lynnetta Ellison v. Autozone Inc et al
as 2:2011cv07686
Defendant:
Autozone Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Lynnetta Ellison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
