Cases 21 - 30 of 392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Webster v. Autozone Development, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv13033
Plaintiff:
Dwayne E. Webster
Defendant:
Autozone Development, LLC, Autzone Stores, LLC, AutoZone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Walles et al v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12889
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walles and Jose Vargas
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rochelle v. Autozoners, LLC
as 23-7847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROCHELLE
Defendant / Appellee:
AUTOZONERS, LLC, DBA Autozone, ALLDATA LLC, DBA Alldata Automotive Intelligence, AUTOZONE, INC. and others
Defendant:
GEORGE VERKAMP and SATWINDER MANGAT
Salvador Aceves, Jr. v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 2:2023cv09960
Plaintiff:
Salvador Aceves, Jr.
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Felton v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01427
Plaintiff:
Ronnell Felton
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and Tiara Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brunet v. AutoZone Development LLC
as 2:2023cv06732
Plaintiff:
Byron Brunet
Defendant:
AutoZone Development LLC, AutoZone, Inc. and Auto Shack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
S3G Technology LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TALUS CORPORATION v. AUTOZONE INC
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
TALUS CORPORATION
Defendant:
AUTOZONE, INC and AUTOZONE INC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
