Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Neal v. Demaroney
as 23-10889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Neal
Defendant / Appellee:
April Demaroney, Captain of Correctional Officer, Terry Raines, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Jason Hardegree, Assistant Warden and others
Steve Riddick v. C. Mullens
as 23-6636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MULLENS, UNIT MANAGER LARRY COLLINS, SGT. B. BARNETTE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Ferrara v. Wallace
as 22-51099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John D. Ferrara
Defendant / Appellee:
Terry Jay Wallace, Sr., Veterans Affairs Police Chief, Jeffrey B. Barnett, Police Chief- City of Kyle, Edward Sandoval, Cameron County District Attorney's Office and others
Hopkins v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borden v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Borden
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAllister v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
George L. McAllister
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Bill Rusk
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barganski v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Robert Barganski
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
