Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Demos v. Poli, et al.
as 24-7418
Defendant:
D. RIOS, Corrections Officer, Twin Rivers Unit, Monroe Correctional Complex, MACK CHRISTIAN, Corrections Officer, Twin Rivers Unit, Monroe Correctional Complex, B. PETERSON, Grievance and Resolution Specialist, Twin Rivers Unit, Monroe Correctional Complex and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Demos v. Poli et al
as 2:2024cv01731
Defendant:
David Poli, John Doe, Mack Christian and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 2:2024cv01695
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, B Peterson and K Bechler
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NPI Debt Fund II, LP v. Suburban Propane, LP et al
as 2:2023cv11463
Plaintiff:
LPI Debt Fund II, LP and NPI Debt Fund II, LP
Defendant:
Suburban Propane, LP, Michael Votzke, David Urton and others
Peterson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Mark B. Peterson
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dixon v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Coffman v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08622
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Lifshitz v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08564
Plaintiff:
Phil Lifshitz
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Bushansky v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08527
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle B. Peterson and others
Minzer v. Signify Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08540
Plaintiff:
Shoshana Minzer
Defendant:
Signify Health, Inc., Matthew S. Holt, Kyle Armbrester and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
