Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Meyers v. Zook et al
as 7:2025cv00376
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Zook, J. Blevins, Lt. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis et al v. McKoy et al
as 1:2025cv03516
Plaintiff:
Teanja Nicole Travis and T.M.
Defendant:
Lionel A McKoy, B. Walker, Shi Mynn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson v. Parties, et al.
as 25-2640
Plaintiff:
TEDDY LEROY WILSON, JR.
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, Oceanside Police Officers, Tri City Hospital Staff, Oceanside Fire and Paramedics, and Oceanside Police Supervisors and Trainers, Sergeant JEFFREY BRANDT, Oceanside Police, DANIAL POST, Oceanside Police Officer and others
Judson B. Walker et al v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv01730
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Judson B. Walker and Judson B. Walker 2008 Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Walker et al v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv01733
Plaintiff:
Judson B. Walker, Trustee and Judson B. Walker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Walker v. USA
as 5:2025cv00444
Petitioner:
Felecia B Walker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Paz v. Walker
as 1:2025cv00003
Respondent:
B Walker
Petitioner:
Cesar Ariel Paz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03056
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02821
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
William Walker v. Bobbi Butts
as 23-5705
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM B. WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
BOBBI JO BUTTS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
