Cases 1 - 10 of 167
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Hill v. United States
as 24-1772
Petitioner:
Andre B. Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Hill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
William B. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. USA
as 4:2023cv00894
Petitioner:
Andre B. Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HILL v. BYRD, M.D. et al
as 1:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, M.D. and LAUREN CUPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04951
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO B HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2023cv02370
Plaintiff:
JANET B HILL and Janet B. Hill
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Albert Robinson v. Statewide Wrecker Service, Inc., et al
as 23-11910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT M. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATEWIDE WRECKER SERVICE, INC., RICHARD JOEL GARNER, BETSY ANNETTE GARNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
HILL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, THOMAS WELLINGTON, T. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
