Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Grigsby v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Grigsby
Defendant:
Francisco Jacquez, Mark Castellaw, C.E. Wilber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sims v. Sayre et al
as 4:2008cv01691
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Sims
Defendant:
Michael Sayre, M. McLean, J. Joseph Kravitz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grigsby v. Horel et al
as 3:2008cv01475
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Grigsby
Defendant:
Robert Horel, Darren Bradbury, M. Smelosky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv05831
Petitioner:
Howard Dontus Leonard
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Robert Horel, B. Samples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard Nedoss Dontus Lettus Vanderbilt Leonard v. Robert Horel et al
as 2:2007cv07329
Petitioner:
Howard Nedoss Dontus Lettus Laroyce Galloway Vanderbilt Leonard
Respondent:
Robert Horel, P T Smith, Gerald J Levi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard Dontus Nedoss Galloway Laroyce Leoanard v. Robert A Horel et al
as 2:2007cv06679
Petitioner:
Howard Dontus Nedoss Galloway Laroyce Leoanard
Respondent:
Robert A Horel, P T Smith, C Thelm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grigsby v. Horel
as 3:2007cv02566
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Grigsby
Defendant:
Robert Horel, Francisco Jacquez, Darren Bradbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Horel et al
as 3:2007cv01335
Plaintiff:
Cord E. Grady
Defendant:
Robert Horel, B. Samples and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Terry et al
as 5:2007cv01329
Plaintiff:
Charles Newman
Defendant:
P. Terry, W.A Bumby, Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
