Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 22-7377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK REID
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, VA Dept. of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Makdessi v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Jeffrey Kiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 7:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Reid
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, J. Bledsoe, Dr. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Ramey et al
as 7:2021cv00348
Defendant:
A. Duncan, Fleming, #1 Doe Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Red Onion State Prisons Medical Department et al
as 7:2021cv00051
Defendant:
S. Fletcher, Regional Director, B. Witt and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Troy Braxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00881
Defendant:
D. Yates, J. Lambert, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6933
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6173
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rowland v. Bledsoe et al
as 7:2018cv00391
Defendant:
Kiser, B. Witt, J. Artrip and others
Plaintiff:
Cordaro A. W. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
